Ross Dannenberg Quoted by Law360 on the Pokemon Patent Concern
Ross Dannenberg was quoted in Law360 regarding Pok?mon-related patents and claim scope.
Search attorney bios, news, publications, and commentary.
Read KellDann's latest news, publications, events, and commentary on intellectual property, AI, technology law, and video games.
44 items
Ross Dannenberg was quoted in Law360 regarding Pok?mon-related patents and claim scope.
Kirk taught a course on patent prosecution ethics in view of recent disciplinary cases at the USPTO.
Ross Dannenberg was recognized in IAM Patent 1000 in 2025 for patent and intellectual property work.
Kirk wrote an article on ballroom dance patents for the magazine American Dancer.
Scott presented regarding 2024 updates to patent law for the D.C. Bar.
Founding Partner Ross Dannenberg presented “Navigating Video Game IP and the Intersection of Copyrights, Trademarks and Patents” for an In-House Connect webinar on Wednesday, September 25. Ross examined the challenges in protecting IP rights, legal strategies determining the best avenue to protect IP rights in the gaming industry. Ross also discussed: Learn more and find […]
Scott Kelly was recognized in IAM Patent 1000 for patent and intellectual property work.
Ross Dannenberg was recognized in IAM Patent 1000 in 2024 for patent and intellectual property work.
Founding Partner Ross Dannenberg spoke on the “IP Rights in Gaming: Leveraging Trademarks, Copyrights Patents to Protect From Development to Delivery” Strafford panel on Wednesday, May 29, 2024. The CLE webinar will provide guidance to IP counsel advising creators, designers, companies others in the gaming industry on managing key IP challenges. The panel discussed infringement […]
Ross Dannenberg and Scott M. Kelly presented at the More Than Just a Game (MTJG) conference in London on May 9-10. The Conference focused on issues raised in video game law by the intersection of technical advancement in AI and lawmaking principles. Ross participated in the panel “Patent and Innovation” on May 9. This session […]
PatentAgility can be unreliable and inaccurate. We take no responsibility for your use of those tools.